Automation
Automate a process without hiding its errors
Map the normal path, exceptions and recovery in the same operational view.
Choose a stable sequence before automating the whole process
Automation becomes fragile when its scope contains too many implicit decisions. A frequent sequence with named exceptions is usually a better first boundary.
The map should represent the work as it happens, including manual corrections and incomplete input.
- What event starts the sequence?
- Which data is mandatory?
- Which approval changes the next step?
- Who acts when a step cannot continue?
Give every run a visible state
A silent workflow creates a new kind of uncertainty. People need to distinguish waiting, running, completed and intervention-required states.
A useful activity trail highlights decisions and recovery context without collecting irrelevant or sensitive data.
Design exceptions alongside the normal path
Missing data, an unavailable service and a failed business rule should not collapse into the same generic message.
The objective is not to remove every human action. It is to reserve human attention for decisions that need it and provide enough context to act.